| |
Outcome photos can be powerful, but use with care
Why some pictures can ruin your message
Skilled practitioners want everyone to appreciate
the work they do, and before-and-after photos can work wonders.
But, remember that patients are interested in personal benefits,
not clinical process. For external marketing materials, use
images that illustrate positive outcomes and benefits and
save the clinical pictures for colleagues.
We are often asked about using "before-and-after"
photos in advertising materials. Here's the short answer:
Outcome photos and "before-and-after" photos, often
are terrific. "Work in progress photos" (e.g., surgeries),
almost never.
Outcome photos (afters) work very well, especially when you
say "actual patient."
Before-and after photos can also be very convincing, if there
is an obvious benefit in the "afters."" (We
can't tell you how many unimpressive photos we have seen for
procedures like microdermabrasion and IPL treatments.) It
is ok to style the patient in the after photos, as long as
the styling doesn't appear to be the only difference.
One more thing - oftentimes the before can be too unattractive,
so use care.
"During" photos are not only unappealing to prospective
patients, they are downright scary. Maybe we should be asked
more often because we frequently see brochures, websites and
other external audience materials that include painfully scary
photos. (It is sometimes reasonable to use them carefully
as part of informed consent while you are there in the room.)
Almost every type of healthcare specialty and sub-specialty
practitioner is tempted to display their skills, experience
and handiwork as part of their marketing message. Surprisingly,
this isn't limited to cosmetic and appearance-directed services
in orthodontics, reconstructive dentistry, plastic surgery
and the like. The question of "before, during and after"
images also comes to us from unlikely medical corners such
as gastroenterology and general surgery.
If you are tempted to use patient or medical condition photos
on your website, brochures, or in your healthcare organization,
hospital, group or practice-the wrong images will do more
harm than good. If you're in doubt, call us for a second opinion.
Here are some general guidelines in selecting
appropriate photos.
- Patients want results, not process. Universally,
individuals seek healthcare in search of happiness. Their
first and foremost desire is some measure of personal improvement.
Accordingly, photos, images, illustrations and even videos
about what you deliver should illustrate the benefits. These
individuals don't need or want clinical instruction.
- Photos of people are better. Too many
dentists, for example, use clinical photos of teeth. Generally,
it is better to show the full face, in context.
- Advertising is not "informed consent."
Distinguish between images for use in external messages
(seen outside the office), and their selective use in the
privacy of consultative patient information and informed
consent discussions. Before and after images can provide
comparisons to help shape realistic expectations.
- Be careful about implied promises. There
is a compelling message in previous outcomes, but Illustrations
or images of previous results cannot be presented as a promise
about future.
- Clear all legal hurdles. Having a photo
is not the same as having the legal rights and permissions
to use it in any way outside of the private and clinical
needs. Get advice on clearances, permissions and releases
on all photos, especially if they are patient-related images.
Properly used, outcome photos can be effective support for
a positive and persuasive marketing message about weight loss,
dentistry, dermatology, cosmetic and plastic surgery, medical
spas and medispas.
There are many visual elements in brochures, websites, posters,
signs and other tools of healthcare advertising, and this
just scratches the surface. Put down the photos and call us
today—at 800-656-0907—about creating
first-class marketing materials that put your best face forward.
|
|
|
digg
